DIY StringPod

I've read before about people using a stringpod (monopod made of string) to help stabilize their photos. I never really thought much of the idea, because I'm not sure how much stabilization you actually get (it can't be more than a stop, if even that much). However, now that I'm starting to play around with video a bit, I thought it would be worth a try. (When it comes to video, every bit of added stabilization helps) Here's how to make your own:



What you'll need: the shortest 1/4" bolt you can find (mine is 1/2"), a washer (I used a 2" washer for mine, more on why in a minute), and about 6' of a thin string/twine/rope/whatever. I picked all of these up at the hardware store for $3, but the actual cost is probably closer to $1 because there was plenty of twine leftover. Also, you'll need a pair of scissors to cut the twine. Tie one end of the twine around the washer. Set it on the floor, and measure out the twine so that the end comes up to around your chin (where the bottom of the camera will be when you shoot). Cut the twine, and tie the other end around the head of the bolt. Make sure this knot is tight enough so that it won't slip off the bolt when not in use. (Note that you can store the twine wrapped around the washer.) To use, screw the bolt into the bottom of your camera like so:



Drop the washer on the floor, step on it, and pull up on the string to apply tension. This is partially why I chose a larger washer - it provides a bigger platform to stand on, ensuring it won't slip around. It also makes a handy way to store the string, because you can just wrap it right up. This tension will help keep your hands from bouncing around while you shoot, which is what provides the stability. I did a quick video test comparing some zoomed footage shot handheld and with the stringpod:

DIY StringPod Test from Simon Hucko on Vimeo.

It doesn't make a huge difference, but I think there's some improvement. I also think that with a little practice I'll get better at cutting down on the "wiggle" you see at the end of the video (caused by the camera twisting around the string). Add in my trusty gorilla pod, and I have a nice little video kit that will fit in a jacket pocket, or can live in my camera/computer bag:



~S

[title of blog] on flickr

52 weeks: Week 10 wrapup

© 2010 Simon Hucko

10 weeks down! Given the amount of photos that trickled in during the day yesterday, I changed my mind on a weekly deadline. The new deadline will be Sunday at 12pm EDT. Wrapup posts will now be up on Tuesday, with my weekly ramblings switched to Monday. Hopefully this will work out better for everyone.

My photo this week is an exercise in dynamic range. It may look a little dark to you here, I suggest viewing it larger to really appreciate all the foreground detail. I did take a bracketed shot, I think this would benefit from that by brightening things up just a touch without losing the detail out the window. I pushed things a little with the RAW, but I couldn't go much farther without it getting noisy. I do like the feeling imparted with this shot, I think it's calming and pretty accurately reflects the experience of being there. This shot would be made better by having a person sitting on the couch, but I didn't have any willing subjects with me. Maybe next time.

Congratulations to irv_b for this week's winner "misery"


© irv_b

Take a few minutes to really look at this photo. From irv_b's description: "...I saw this shot which I hope expresses the divide but common feeling." I think this is exactly what this photo is about. An interesting social commentary, and a very gritty street photo. Great work.

That's it for this week. I hope you all find some time to take a photo or two. Even if you can't get out for a proper photoshoot, carry a small camera around with you (point n shoot, iPhone, whatever) and document something interesting that you see during the day. Not only will this remove any excuses you have about taking photos, it should help you get your creative juices flowing and produce some interesting photos. Looking forward to seeing your submissions.

~S

[title of blog] on flickr

LensBaby

© 2010 Simon Hucko

I know I promised a histogram post this week, and I'll get there, I promise. (possibly even later this week) I just didn't have the time to get everything together.

I know I don't usually write posts about gear, either, but I had the opportunity to use a truly fantastic little bit of kit. I went for a photowalk with Adam and Stacey (two other Ithaca photographers) on Saturday. Stacey was kind enough to lend me a lensbaby to play with (I think it was the older lensbaby 2.0). Oh man, are they fun. The lens is designed to give you a "sweet spot" that's in focus, leaving the rest of the image with a crazy blur (almost like a zoom blur). This really makes your subject pop, and gives you a whole new perspective on the world around you.


© 2010 Simon Hucko

Given more time with a lens like this, I think I would have been better able to take advantage of the effects it gives. Check out Stacey's huge lensbaby set for an idea of the amazing range of creative possibilities.

If you're ever looking for a creative pick-me-up, I highly recommend borrowing/renting/buying one of these and playing with it for a while. I'm totally addicted, and have added one to my photo gear wishlist.

One caveat - the lens doesn't talk to the camera at all, so you're on your own for exposure unless you use an old film body with stop down metering. No problem, though, just use the histogram as your meter. Yes, I'll write that post. I promise. Seriously.

~S

[title of blog] on flickr

52 weeks: Week 9 wrapup

© 2010 Simon Hucko

9 weeks already! Looks like some of you are here for the long haul, and for that I thank you. It's not easy finding time to shoot every week, especially when the weather is uninspiring and you've used up the easy shots. Even if you miss a week here and there, I applaud all of you for continuing to post and comment in the group. There has been some great sharing and feedback going around, which I hope you all are enjoying as much as I am. Hopefully with the spring weather approaching inspiration will come a little bit easier. To any of you who have wandered away from the group, you're always welcome to come back and start posting and commenting again. If you missed the first few weeks but still want to join, you're welcome to start any time. The more, the merrier.

My photo this week is somewhat of a departure from my normal style. I was inspired recently by some out of focus photos that I saw while browsing through Flickr, so I decided I would give it a try - you could say I'm going through my impressionist phase ;) Part of the challenge of taking an out of focus photo is for it to still have some meaning to the viewer. It's hard for me to say what people will see in this photo, since when I look at it I can picture the scene in my memory (and in focus, obviously). For me, it captures the feeling of walking down the commons (a pedestrian mall in Ithaca, NY) at dusk - the buildings, the trees, the people, the neon and the streetlights. I stopped down my 50mm f1.8 a little bit to get the polygonal bokeh, since I actually like that effect. Not everyone agrees, and most modern lenses are made with rounded aperture blades so they will produce circles no matter what f-stop you're shooting at. In this case, the contrast of regular shapes against the blur is a nice added detail and really makes the lights pop in this photo. This style is still pretty new for me, and is something I'll continue exploring.

This week's winning photo is "Irish whiskey tasting" by :


© chofler

Nice shallow depth of field and black and white tones in this shot. I like the composition, it tells a nice story and still leaves some details to the imagination. I also happen to be rather partial to Irish whiskey, so that didn't hurt either ;)

Good work everyone, keep on shooting!

~S

[title of blog] on flickr

My thoughts on Judge Joe Brown

If you're in touch with the photography community on Twitter or Flickr, chances are you've already watched this video. For those of you who haven't, I suggest watching at least part of it before reading on (and really, you don't need to watch all 10 minutes, I suggest starting around 3:30).

In brief, a bride is "suing" a budget wedding photographer for not delivering professional results. There are many things wrong with this case, but I'm going to start by saying I think they're being unfair to the photographer. Unless the photographer presented a portfolio that was far superior to the results that she delivered (which I doubt), there's no case here. The bride presumably saw the photographer's work before hiring her (and if she didn't, she's an idiot), so she should have known what to expect. Unless the photographer promised something that she didn't deliver, legally there's nothing to stand on here (which is probably why it was on JJB in the first place).

The main takeaway from this video is that with wedding photography (as with life), you get what you pay for. The bride wanted professional quality results, but wasn't willing to pay for them. $1300 (or whatever it was, don't remember exactly) might sound like a lot to you, but in the world of wedding photography that's almost the bottom bracket. What do you get for that price? Someone shooting your wedding with an entry level camera and their kit zooms, and prints from WalMart. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, that's just how it goes. And if the bride viewed this photographer's work and agreed to hire her, then obviously whatever she saw was good enough. That or the bride somehow thought things would improve for her wedding. The only thing I can think of to defend the bride here is that the photographer's portfolio probably contains ceremony photos from where she was allowed to use a flash, and so they aren't dark or blurry like the ones the bride got. In this respect, the photographer wasn't really prepared to shoot a ceremony without flash, and that should have been stated somewhere along the way. The fact that the photographer was angry that she wasn't allowed to use a flash clues you in that she isn't very experienced, as that has been the case with a lot of weddings I've been to. Again, this is reflected in her price point and the portfolio presented.

I take issue with JJB's attitude. He misses the point entirely, and uses this "case" to show off his (or his script writers') photographic knowledge. Pro series cameras and f/2.8 zooms would have probably helped with the low light photos, but again - you're hiring a budget photographer so don't expect professional gear. Having prints made at Walmart is not ideal, but again - you're hiring a budget photographer, so don't expect professional prints. Last I checked, 8x10's *are* enlargements. And, unless there was some severe cropping going on, the camera she was using would be perfectly adequate for printing up to 20x30. You wouldn't walk into a car dealer, buy a Toyota, and then sue the dealer because it's not a Porche. Attacking this photographer for not being a gear head at the top end of her market is worthless and irrelevant.

There are a lot of wedding photographers who complain that people like this are undercutting them and ruining the industry. My response to them is that if you're good at what you do, you should never even have to think twice about these people. Sure, you lose brides who are trying to save money or just don't have the budget to hire you, but they won't even be looking at you in the first place. And if you think you're better than a budget photographer but you're still competing on price, it's time to wake up and start charging what you're worth - you're only undercutting yourself and devaluing your own work.

To any future brides out there, remember this when you start shopping for a photographer. If you want professional quality work you have to hire a professional quality photographer, and they don't come cheap. What you're paying for is a photographer who will come prepared with the right equipment (and backup equipment in case something fails or breaks, which happens), the right knowledge and experience to use that equipment, the ability to make you and your wedding party/family comfortable and pose you for flattering and unique formals, the right processing software and knowhow to produce gorgeous images (trust me, that's a big part of it), and the right printing services to deliver outstanding prints and books. I'm not saying you have to blow your entire budget on a photographer or only hire the most expensive in your area, but be aware of what your money will get you and don't have unrealistic expectations. Always meet with your photographer and look through their work before signing a contract (and especially before signing a deposit check). Ask if you can see a whole wedding, not just a polished book or portfolio, so you have an idea of what you're really getting.

That's about it for my little rant here. What are your thoughts? Do you think JJB was right to rip into this photographer? Should the bride have won this case? Are photographers like this devaluing the industry? Please comment and share a bit.

~S

[title of blog] on flickr

Shooting through Glass

© 2010 Simon Hucko

Sorry for the late post this week. I've been pretty busy/uninspired, but today I came across a photo I took a little while back and got an idea for a quick tip.

There are often times that you're forced to take a photo through glass (museums, zoos, out your window, store fronts, aquariums, etc). Even if the glass is perfectly clean (which it never is), it can still introduce reflections and other tell-tale signs that it's there. Here's how to minimize/eliminate those problems and get photos that look like you're up close and personal with your subject:

- The most important thing is to get close. I mean very close, to the point where part of your lens should be touching the glass. A rubber lens hood is ideal for this, since they still stick out a tiny bit when folded back. This allows you to press the lens right up against the glass and gives you a good light seal without worrying about scratches. A regular lens hood will work, too, but that puts you a little farther away which could be problematic. Getting this close will do two things. First, it cuts out all reflections because the lens/hood/camera body/your head block all the light falling on that part of the glass. Second, it brings the glass very close to the front element, helping to take it farther from the plane of focus. More on that in a second.

- Shoot at a large aperture. This reduces your depth of field, helping to insure that the glass will not be in focus. The farther out of focus the glass is, the less any little smudges on it will affect your photo (they turn into huge blurs and eventually cover the whole image, making them effectively invisible). Using a longer focal length (if possible) will help with this as well, since it also cuts down on depth of field.

So there you have it - next time you have to shoot through glass don't let the viewer know it was there. This technique also works on fences, wires, security glass, etc., just make sure you use a long fast-aperture lens to fully blur them out of your photo. Don't believe me? Try it sometime, you'll be amazed.

~S

[title of blog] on flickr

52 weeks: Week 8 wrapup

© 2010 Simon Hucko

8 weeks down. Thanks again to everyone for keeping up with posting - I'm really enjoying seeing all of your photos week to week.

My photo this week is a bit of a personal victory. I saw this shot a while back when I was walking around, but couldn't work myself up to approaching the window to take it. When I was out walking around the other day I forced myself to go over and do it. After taking the shot, I stepped in the door and talked with the guy (I'm assuming it was Andy) for a bit - turns out he has a very similar painting hanging on his wall. I'm glad I did it, it's probably not the best photo I've ever taken, but there's a lot of layers going on in there and it's a step towards getting over my phobia of photographing strangers.

This week's winner is "big-ben-lights" by irv_b


© irv_b

I really like the long exposure here - there are a lot of great lines in this photo, and plenty to keep my interest while looking at it. Very nicely done.

That's it for this week. Keep on shooting!

~S

[title of blog] on flickr